A scoring system that reads eight of the most clinically meaningful cardiometabolic markers against functional optimal ranges, not the conventional lab ranges built on a sick population average. Enter your lab values and get a composite 0 to 100 score with a breakdown of every marker.
A scoring system that reads eight of the most clinically meaningful cardiometabolic markers against functional optimal ranges, not the conventional lab ranges built on a sick population average. The calculator produces a composite 0 to 100 score, identifies which markers are dragging you down, and explains exactly what each one means.
All eight fields are required for an accurate composite score. Enter only what you have.
Most cardiometabolic risk assessments lean on total cholesterol and LDL. That framework is incomplete and often misleading. These eight markers, weighted correctly, give a real picture of what is driving risk at the metabolic, inflammatory, and hormonal level.
Each marker is scored from 0 to 100 using piecewise linear interpolation between anchor points defined by functional optimal ranges. The anchors were selected to reflect the clinical evidence on cardiometabolic risk, not conventional lab reference ranges.
The composite score is a weighted sum of the individual marker scores. TG:HDL and fasting insulin carry the highest weight at 20 percent each because they are the strongest predictors of insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk. hs-CRP and the testosterone to estradiol ratio carry 15 percent each. Homocysteine carries 10 percent. HbA1c, ferritin, and Free T3 round out the remaining 20 percent.
A score of 85 or above on any individual marker places it in the optimal band. Between 60 and 84 is suboptimal. Below 60 needs attention. The composite score maps to four bands: Elite (90 to 100), Strong (75 to 89), Needs Work (50 to 74), and At Risk (below 50).
This tool is educational. It does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. A complete cardiometabolic assessment requires a full panel reviewed in clinical context by a qualified practitioner.
This score gives you a snapshot. A full lab intelligence review reads all 31 markers in sequence using the MARCH method and builds a protocol from what it finds.